answering questions

Watch the Zimbardo Prison Study Documentary. Answer the questions on this assignment by the due date on the schedule to the best of your ability. This assignment will not be due until we have finished covering research methods and social psychology. Look over these questions as you begin to watch the documentary. Pay attention as you watch to information that will help you answer some of the first questions on the assignment. Some of the questions at the beginning of the assignment you should already be able to answer. To answer the other questions you will need to study more information that will be covered in future lectures.
Answer the questions in complete sentences. Try to explain your answers fully. You may hand write your answers legibly or you may type your answers on the document for this assignment in the Social Psychology folder in course content on the course website. Answers. I really encourage you to type if you can on the final assignment you turn in.
In the study in the documentary you watched on the Stanford Prison Experiment, what do you think was the main, very general, question Zimbardo really wanted to answer? Is this question a descriptive or causal question? As you write your answer, consider what he seemed to really want to find out, using everyday language.
Did Zimbardo’s study give him an answer to his main, general question? If so, what was the answer?
How did Zimbardo manipulate the subjects in the study to put them in a prison like situation? Describe at least three things he did to structure the environment.
How did the guards in the study react to being put in the role of prison guard? Did they act like prison guards or not? In what way did they act like guards or not act like guards?
Did this change as the study went on?
Did different guards act differently in their response to being put in this role?

How did the prisoners react to being put in the role of prisoner? Did they act like prisoners or not? In what way did they act like prisoners or not act like prisoners?
Did this change as the study went on?
Did different prisoners act differently in their response to being put in this role?

Describe what happened.
Describe what happened.
Do you think Zimbardo was biased about the answer to his main research question –the question you wrote down at the beginning of this assignment? Why or why not? If he was probably biased, in what way do you think he was biased and how might this bias have affected his interpretation of the finding of his study?
Regarding the sample used in this study, was random sampling or random assignment used? If they were used, how were these research practices used in this study? Explain.
Do you think this study was ethical? Why or why not?
Explain how the Zimbardo prison study illustrated the principle in social psychology of de-individuation. What happened to the prisoners, to the guards, and to Zimbardo himself that is an example of de-individuation?
In what way did the study show that the natural preference humans have for our ingroup may not always control our behavior? How did the preference for one’s own kind not always lead the members of one of the groups to band together?
Explain how the Zimbardo prison experiment seems to have illustrated the principle in social psychology of diffusion of responsibility.
Explain whether the Zimbardo study suggests that abuse of authority is often caused by dispositional factors or by situational factors. Why did you pick dispositional or situational factors?
Answerall the questions

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount. USE Discount code “GWEXDDSRGCF10” for 10% discount

This question has been answered by our writers. you can buy the answer below or order your 0% plagiarized answer

Order your 0% plagiarized answer